Website is intended for physicians
Search:

 

Abstract:

Diseases of the circulatory system in a few decades are one of the major causes of death and disability in the population in many countries around the world. In Russian Federation, a number of newly diagnosed cases of coronary heart disease and mortality of the working population of this pathology is growing. In clinical practice at the present time, various radiological techniques assess the condition of the heart and coronary vessels, determine the location and volume of lesions. In the available literature, however, we found no data on methods of research that would reveal the correlation between the X-ray anatomy of coronary vessels and structural and functional state of the heart muscle. Thus, the need for comprehensive scientific research is obvious. Results of this study will, on the basis of survey data, using the methods of radiation diagnosis, objectively assess the level of metabolic and structural and functional state of the cardiomyocytes in cardiac patients. This will improve the accuracy and informativeness of diagnosis, as well as the increase of the control of effectiveness of therapy and quality of patients' life with cardiac diseases. 

 

References

1.     Pakkal M., Raj V., McCann G.P Non-invasive imaging in coronary artery disease including anatomical and functional evaluation of ischemia and viability assessment. The British Journal of Radiology. 2011; 84: S280-S295.

2.     Boqueria L.A., Gudkova R.G. Cardiac Surgery - 2010. Diseases and congenital malformations of the circulatory system. Moscow: Publishing Bakoulev center for cardiovascular surgery of RussianAcademy of Medical Sciences. 2011. 192 p [In Russ].

3.     Lindenbraten L.D. Beam diagnostics: achievements and challenges of modern times. Radiology - practice. 2007, 3: 4-15[In Russ].

4.     Sharafeev A.Z. Diagnosis of associated atherosclerotic lesions of different pools in CHD patients. Kazan Medical Journal. 2009; XC (2), 145-148[In Russ].

5.     Shahov B.E., Krinina I.V., Matusowa E.I., Vostriakova L.V. Classic radiologic differential diagnosis of angina syndrome. Medical almanac. 2007, 1: 58-61[In Russ].

6.     Ternovoy S.K., Akchurin R.S., Fedotenkov I.S. et all. Multislice computed tomography in the diagnosis of non-invasive cross-mammaro and aortocoronary bypass grafts. Kuban Research Medical Bulletin. 2010, 6: 147-153 [In Russ].

7.     Nudnov I.N., Bolotov P.A., Rudenko B.A. Comparative analysis of the morphology after implantation of coronary atherosclerosis and uncovered stents drug according to coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Medical imaging. 2011, 5: 104-113 [In Russ].

8.     Lishmanov J.B., Markov V.A., Krivonogov N.G. Possibilities of radionuclide methods in forecasting the results of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients after myocardial infarction. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2008, 2 (4): 17-25 [In Russ].

9.     The methods of radiologic diagnosis: a manual. S.K. Ternovoy and others (Ed. Ed. Sapozhkova L.P.). Rostov n / D: Phoenix. 2007, 137 p. [In Russ].

10.   Sinicyn V.E., Fomina I.G., Pisarev M.V., Gagarina N.V. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of detection of coronary calcification in the preclinical stage of ischemic heart disease. Cardiovascular therapy and prevention. 2004, 3 (5): 118-125 [In Russ].

11.   Kothawade K., Noel Bairey Merz C. Microvascular coronary dysfunction in women - pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2011; 36 (8): 291-318.

12.   Gorge G., Ge J., von Birgelen C., Erbel R. Intracoronary ultrasound - the new gold-standart? Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie. 1998; 87 (8): 575-585.

13.   Movsesyants M.Y, Ivanov V.A., Trunin I.V. Intravascular ultrasound with Virtual Histology in lesions of the coronary arteries. Cardiology. 2009, 12: 58- 61 [In Russ].

14.   Veselova T.N., Merkulova I.N., Yarovaya E.B., Ruda M. J. Evaluation of myocardial viability Metolit MSCT for the prediction of postinfarction left ventricular remodeling. Regional circulation and microcirculation. 2013, 1 (45): 17-24 [In Russ].

15.   Stukalova O.V., Vlasova, E.E., Tarasov L.V., Ternovoy S.K. Magnetic resonance imaging of the heart in patients with postinfarction cardiosclerosis preoperative surgical myocardial revascularization. Regional circulation and microcirculation. 2013, 1 (45): 36-41[ In Russ].

16.   Hofer M. Computed tomography. A basic guide. Moscow: Medlit. 2006, 208 p [In Russ].

17.   Galanski M., Prokop M. Spiral and multislice CT of the body. New York, Thieme. 2003.

18.   Ropers D., BaumU., Karsten P. et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin slice multi detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation. 2003; 107: 664-666.

19.   Morozov S.P., Nasnikova I.Y, Sinicyn V.E., Ternovoy S.K. Multidetector computed tomography. (Eds. Thorn SK). M: GEOTAR Media. 2009; 112 p [In Russ].

20.   Boev S.S., Dotsenko N.Y, Gerasimenko L.V., Shekhunova I.A. Coronary artery calcification as a marker of the risk of coronary artery disease and a predictor of cardiovascular events. Health Care in Chuvashia. 2012, 1: 74-79 [In Russ].

21.   Agatston A.S., Janowitz W.R., Hildner F.J. et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1990; 15: 827-832.

22.   Lau G.T., Ridley L.J., Schieb M.C. et al. Coronary artery stenoses: detection with calcium scoring, CT angiography and both methods combined. Radiology. 2005; 235: 415-422.

23.   General and military radiology: a textbook. (Eds. Trufanova GE). St. Petersburg.: MMA, Medkniga ELBI SPB. 2008, 480 p [In Russ].

24.   Perioperative rehabilitation of patients with complicated forms of ischemic heart disease. (By red.prof. V. Burly.) - Ufa. 2012, 336 p [In Russ].

25.   Sicari R., Nihoyannopoulos P., Evangelista A. et al. Stress Echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2008; 9: 415-37.

26.   Klein C., Nekolla S.G., Bengel F.M. et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 2002; 105: 162-167.

27.   Wagner A., Mahrholdt H., Holly T.A., Elliott M.D. et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet. 2003; 361: 374-379.

28.   Lishmanov J.B., Efimova I.J., Chernov V.I. et al. Scintigraphy as a tool for diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of the treatment of heart disease. Siberian Journal of Medicine (Tomsk). 2007, 22 (3): 74-77 [In Russ].

29.   Ryzhkova D.V., Kolesnychenko M.G., Boldueva S.A., Kostin J.S. The study of coronary hemodynamics methods of positron emission tomography in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Siberian Medical Journal (Tomsk). 2012, 27 (2): 50-56 [In Russ].

30.   Nekolla S., Reder S., Saraste A. et al. Evaluation of the Novel Myocardial Perfusion Positron-Emission Tomography Tracer 18F-BMS-747158-02: Comparison to 13N-Ammonia and Validation With Microspheres in a Pig Model. Circulation. 2009; 119(17): 2333-2342. 

31.   Gerber B.L., Ordoubadi F.F., Wijns W. et al. Positron emission tomography using 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose and euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp: optimal criteria for the prediction of recovery of post-ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Results from the European Community concerted action multicenter study on use of 18F- fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the detection of myocardial viability. Eur. Heart. J . 2001: 22: 1691-701.

ANGIOLOGIA.ru (АНГИОЛОГИЯ.ру) - портал о диагностике и лечении заболеваний сосудистой системы