Список литературы 

1.     American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2006. American. Cancer. Society. 2006.

2.     National Cancer Institute. Factors influencingdeclines in breast cancer mortality: questionsand answers. Accessed at: http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/CISNE T.

3.     Thomas D.B., Gao D.L., Ray R.M. et al. Randomized trial of breast selfexamination in Shanghai: final results. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 2002;94: 1445-1457.

4.     Hackshaw A.K., Paul E.A. Breast self-examination and death from breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Br.J. Cancer. 2003; 88: 1047-1053.

5.     Mincey B.A., Perez E.A. Advances in screening, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer. Mayo. Clin. Proc. 2004; 79: 810-816.

6.     McDonald S., Saslow D., Alciati M.H. Performance and reporting of clinical breast examination: a review of the literature. CA Cancer. J.Clin. 2004; 54: 345-361.

7.     Saslow D., Hannan J., Osuch J. et al. Clinicalbreast examination: practical recommendations for optimizing performance and reporting. CA Cancer. J. Clin. 2004; 54: 327-344.

8.     Smith R.A., Saslow D., Sawyer K.A. et al.American Cancer Society guidelines for breastcancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer. J.Clin. 2003; 53: 141-169.

9.     Heywang-Koebrunner S.H., Dershaw D.D.,Schreer I. Diagnostic breast imaging. 2ndedition. New York. Thieme. 2001.

10.   Duffy S.W., Tabar L., Chen H.H. et al. Theimpact of organized mammography servicescreening on breast carcinoma mortality inseven Swedish counties. Cancer. 2002; 95 (3):458-469.

11.   Pad E., Duffy S.W., Giorgi D. et al. Quantification of the effect of mammographic screeningon fatal breast cancers: the Florence Programme 1990-1996. Br.J. Cancer. 2002; 87 (1):

12.   Carney P.A., Miglioretti D.L., Yankaskas B.C.et al. Individual and combined effects of age,breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. [Published correction appears inAnn Intern Med. 2003; 138: 771]. Ann. Intern.Med. 2003; 138: 168-175.

13.   Gennaro G., di Maggio C. Dose comparisonbetween screen/film and fullfield digitalmammography. Eur. Radiol. 2006; 16 (11):2559-2566.

14.   Pisano E.D., Gatsonis C., Hendrick E. et al.Diagnostic performance of digital versus filmmammography for breast-cancer screening.N. Engl.J. Med. 2005; 353 (17): 1773-1783.

15.   Carney P.A., Miglioretti D.L., Yankaskas B.C.et al. Individual and combined effects of age,breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography [Published correction appears inAnn Intern. Med. 2003; 138: 771]. Ann. Intern.Med. 2003; 138: 168-175.

16.   Kerlikowske K., Grady D., Barclay J. et al. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA. 1993; 270: 2444-2450.

17.   Smith R.A., Saslow D., Sawyer K.A. et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer. J. Clin.2003; 53 (3): 141-169.

18.   Dershaw D.D. Mammographic screening ofthe high-risk woman. Am. J. Surg. 2000; 180(4): 288.

19.   ACR practice guideline for the performanceof a breast ultrasound examination. In: ACRpractice guidelines and technical standards:ultrasound research (vol. 10). Reston (VA).ACR. 2002; 763-765.

20.   Stavros A.T., Thickman D., Rapp C.L. et al.Solid breast nodules: use of sonography todistinguish between benign and malignantlesions. Radiology. 1995; 196 (1): 123-134.

21.   Zonderland H.M., Coerkamp E.G., HermansJ. et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography.Radiology. 1999; 213 (2): 413-422.

22.   Warner E., Plewes D.B., Hill K.A., Causer P.A.,Zubovits J.T., Jong R.A. et al. Surveillance ofBRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers withmagnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound,mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA. 2004; 29: 1317-1325.

23.   Kuhl C.K., Schrading S., Leutner C.C. et al.Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance ofwomen at high familial risk for breast cancer.J. Clin. Oncol. 2005; 23: 8469-8476.

24.   Saslow D., Boetes C., Burke W. et al. AmericanCancer Society guidelines for breast screeningwith MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CACancer. J. Clin. 2007; 57: 75-89.

25.   Liberman M., Sampalis F., Mulder D.S. et al.Breast cancer diagnosis by scintimammography: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Breast. Cance. Res. Treat. 2003; 80:115-126.

26.   Schillaci O., Danieli R., Romano P. et al. Scintimammography for the detection of breastcancer. Expert. Rev. Med. Devices. 2005; 2:191-196.

27.   Avril N., Menzel M., Dose J. et al. Glucosemetabolism of breast cancer assessed by 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis.J. Nucl. Med. 2001; 42: 9-16.