Мультиспиральная компьютерная томография в оценке патологии коронарного русла (обзор литературы)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25512/DIR.2015.09.1.10

Для цитирования:
Е.Е. Фуженко, В.В. Ховрин, Т.Ю. Кулагина, В.А. Сандриков «Мультиспиральная компьютерная томография в оценке патологии коронарного русла (обзор литературы)». Журнал Диагностическая и интервенционная радиология. 2015; 9(1); 71-77.

авторы:

Е.Е. Фуженко

В.В. Ховрин

Т.Ю. Кулагина

В.А. Сандриков

ключевые слова:

мультиспиральная компьютерная томография

коронарные сосуды

ишемическая болезнь сердца

диагностическая эффективность

Аннотация:

Цель исследования: анализ возможностей применения мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии у больных с патологией коронарного русла.

Результаты: выполнен анализ литературных данных о применении мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии в диагностике ишемической болезни сердца. Приведены данные о развитии метода, указано, что его диагностическая эффективность связана с технологическими улучшениями, сопровождавшими появление каждого последующего поколения мультиспиральных компьютерных томографов. Рассмотрены возможности использования томографов от 16- до 230-срезовых аппаратов с двумя источниками энергии, показаны преимущества применения режима «двойной энергии» (dual-energy CT) при диагностике коронарной патологии. Приведены факторы, ограничивающие диагностическую эффективность данного метода - артефакты, связанные с движением и выраженной кальцификацией.

Выводы: указано, что внедрение метода в кардиологическую практику способствует рассмотрению его в качестве перспективной альтернативы диагностической инвазивной коронарной ангиографии, высказано предположение, что дальнейшее развитие технологий позволит мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии стать основным методом диагностики коронарной недостаточности и других сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний.

Список литературы

1. Paul J.F., Dambrin G., Caussin C. et al. Sixteen-slice computed tomography after acute myocardial infarction: from perfusion defect to the culprit lesion. Circulation. 2003; 108: 373-374.

2. Sun Z., Choo G.H., Ng K.H. Coronary CT angiography: current status and continuing challenges. Br. J. Radiol. 2012; 85: 495-510.

3. Costello P., Lobree S. Subsecond scanning makes CT even faster. Diag. Imaging. 1996; 18: 76-79.

4. Taguchi K., Aradate H. Algorithm for image reconstruction in multi-slice helical CT. Med. Phys. 1998; 25: 550-561.

5. Flohr T.G., Schaller S., Stierstorfer K. et al. Multidetector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. Radiology. 2005; 235: 756-773.

6. Haberl R., Tittus J., Bohme E. et al. Multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography of coronary arteries in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: an effective filter before catheter angiography Am. Heart J. 2005; 149: 1112-1119.

7. Goldman L.W. Principles of CT: multislice CT. J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2008; 36: 57-68.

8. Lewis M., Keat N., Edyvean S. 16 Slice CT scanner comparison report version 14, 2006. Available from: URL: http://www.impactscan.org/reports/Report06012.htm

9. Achenbach S., Ropers D., Pohle F.K. et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 x 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation. Eur. Heart J. 2005; 26: 1978-1986.

10. Kuettner A., Beck T., Drosch T. et al. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary imaging with 16 detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. Heart. 2005; 91: 938-941.

11. Garcia M.J., Lessick J., Hoffmann M.H. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA. 2006; 296: 403-411.

12. Steigner M.L., Otero H.J., Cai T. et al. Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2009; 25: 85-90.

13. Flohr T.G., McCollough C.H., Bruder H. et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur. Radiol. 2006; 16: 256-268.

14. Achenbach S., Marwan M., Schepis T. et al. High- pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2009; 3: 117-121.

15. Ruzsics B., Lee H., Zwerner P. et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia-initial experience. Eur. J. Radiol. 2008; 18: 2414-2424.

16. Jiang H.C., Vartuli J., Vess C. Gemstone - the ultimatum scintillator for computed tomography. Gemstone detector white paper. London: GE Healthcare, 2008: 1-8

17. Mori S., Endo M., Obata T. et al. Clinical potentials of the prototype 256-detector row CT-scanner. Acad. Radiol. 2005; 12: 148-154.

18. Hoe J., Toh K.H. First experience with 320-row multidetector CT coronary angiography scanning with prospective electrocardiogram gating to reduce radiation dose. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2009; 3: 257-261.

19. De Graaf F.R., Schuijf J.D., Van Velzen J.E. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur. Heart J. 2010; 31: 1908-1915.

20. Sun Z., Jiang W. Diagnostic value of multislice computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Radiol. 2006; 60: 279-286.

21. Pontone G., Andreini D., Bartorelli A. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography: a comparison between prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram triggering. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009; 54: 346-355.

22. Sun Z., Ng K.H. Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-gating in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2012; 28: 2109-2119.

23. Budoff M.J., Dowe D., Jollis J.G. et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008; 52: 1724-1732.

24. Miller J.M., Rochitte C.E., Dewey M. et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl. J. Med. 2008; 359: 2324-2336.

25. Alkadhi H., Stolzmann P., Desbiolles L. et al. Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode. Heart. 2010; 96: 933-938.

26. Hou Y, Yue Y, Guo W. et al. Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality and radiation dose over expanded heart rates. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2012; 28: 153-162.

27. Hou Y, Ma Y, Fan W. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose 256-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography using iterative reconstruction in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur. Radiol. 2014; 24: 3-11.

28. Petcherski O., Gaspar T., Halon D. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 256-row computed tomographic angiography for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease using invasive quantitative coronary angiography as reference standard. Am. J. Cardiol. 2013; 111: 510-515.

29. Van Velzen J.E., De Graaf F.R., Kroft L.J. et al. Performance and efficacy of 320-row computed tomography coronary angiography in patients presenting with acute chest pain: results from a clinical registry. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2012; 28: 865-876.

30. Pelliccia F., Pasceri V., Evangelista A. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2013; 29: 443-452.

31. Gaudio C., Pelliccia F., Evangelista A. et al. 320-row computed tomography coronary angiography vs. conventional coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013; 168: 1562-1564.

32. Li S., Ni Q., Wu H. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: meta-analysis. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013;168: 2699-2705.

33. Barrett J.F., Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics. 2004; 24: 1679-1691.

34. Earls J.P. How to use a prospective gated technique for cardiac CT. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2009; 3: 45-51.

35. Leschka S., Stolzmann P., Schmid F.T. et al. Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur. Radiol. 2008; 18: 1809-1817.

36. Ketelsen D., Thomas C., Werner M. et al. Dualsource computed tomography: estimation of radiation exposure of ECG-gated and ECG-triggered coronary angiography. Eur. J. Radiol. 2010; 73: 274-279.

37. Dikkers R., Greuter M.J., Kristanto W. et al. Assessment of image quality of 64-row Dual Source versus Single Source CT coronary angiography on heart rate: a phantom study. Eur. J. Radiol. 2009; 70: 61-68.

38. Hoffmann U., Moselewski F., Nieman K. et al. Non-invasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006; 47: 1655-1662.

39. Sun Z. Cardiac CT imaging in coronary artery disease: Current status and future directions. Quant Imaging Med. Surg. 2012; 2: 98-105.

40. Halpern E.J., Savage M.P., Fischman D.L., Levin D.C. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in evaluation of patients without symptoms who have positive stress test results. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2010; 194: 1257-1262.

41. Sun Z., Aziz YF., Ng K.H. Coronary CT angiography: how should physicians use it wisely and when do physicians request it appropriately Eur. J. Radiol. 2012; 81: 684-687.